Poll: Teacher Performance Key To Student Achievement
The recent teachers' strike in Chicago
has brought to the forefront of public attention many issues related to
American public schools, among them teacher evaluations, job security
and benefits.
In a survey conducted prior to the strike, majorities of
Americans perceive recruiting and retaining highly qualified teachers
(72%) and a positive school atmosphere (64%) as very important for
improving student achievement in public schools, while increasing
students' (49%), teachers' (46%) and parents' (43%) school satisfaction
levels is also clearly important.
But while attracting effective teachers is a concern across political
and socioeconomic lines, there remain multiple points of dissent on the
best practices for doing so, as well as what constitutes appropriate
levels of teacher pay and school funding.
These are some of the results of
The Harris Poll
of 2,311 U.S. adults (ages 18 and over) surveyed online between July 16 and 23, 2012 by Harris Interactive.
While stakeholders' satisfaction with schools is clearly important to
Americans, it resonates most strongly among those with lower levels of
education and income:
- Americans without college degrees (53%) are more likely than those with a degree (39%) to see increasing students' satisfaction with their schools as very important; they are also more likely to rate parental satisfaction with their children's schools as very important (47% and 33%, respectively).
- Americans earning under $35,000 also place higher importance on school satisfaction than their counterparts, being more likely than those earning $35,000 or more to rate student (55% vs. 44%), teacher (52% vs. 43%) and parent (51% vs. 39%) satisfaction very important.
Teacher Recruitment and Retention
Given the clear importance in Americans' minds of attracting and
holding onto good teachers, another key area is how to best accomplish
this. Overall, Americans most strongly support enabling schools to more
easily remove those teachers not serving students well (73%) as one of
the highest priorities in addressing this goal, along with basing
teacher effectiveness measures largely on student growth (59%).
Providing better professional development opportunities (55%) and
improving job satisfaction (51%) for teachers are also seen as high
priorities by many Americans, along with improving teachers' bonuses and
salaries (45%).
While all of the tested solutions were popular, presenting a
situation in which only one could be funded brings viewpoints into
sharper focus. Enabling schools to more easily remove teachers who are
not serving students well (43%) is Americans' top selection by a
considerable margin, at roughly twice the level of the next strongest
option (basing teacher effectiveness measurements on student growth,
21%). The perceived importance of increasing schools' ability to remove
ineffectual teachers does vary widely:
- By age, its selection drops as low as 31% among echo boomers (ages 18-35) and rises as high as 61% among matures (ages 67+).
- Democrats (33%) are significantly less likely to select this option than either Independents (45%) or Republicans (53%).
- Parents (36%) are less likely to support this approach than those without children in grades K-12 (45%).
Teacher pay and overall funding in public schools
When asked about both teacher pay levels and overall spending on
public schools in their communities, Americans most strongly perceive
each as receiving too little money (46% teachers, 50% schools), followed
– more distantly in the case of overall school funding - by about the
right amount (33% and 27%, respectively). However, opinions again vary
widely:
- Democrats are more likely than Republicans to view both teacher pay (56% vs. 39%) and school funding (63% vs. 39%) as too low. Independents consistently fall between the two parties, though their responses on this matter skew closer to Republican viewpoints.
- Parents (57%) are significantly more likely than adults without children in grades K-12 (48%) to rate overall school funding as too low.
- Females are more likely than males to rate both teacher pay (52% vs. 40%) and school funding (54% vs. 46%) as too low.
- Adults in the South are more likely than those in any other region to perceive teacher pay as too low (31% East, 43% Midwest, 57% South, 48% West).
- The perception of teachers as under-paid (46%) is closer to its 1965 level (42%) than in either 2009 (54%) or 2008 (59%), though the perception of teachers as over-paid (12%) – while small – is at its highest point on record. The perception of schools as under-funded continues to be well above 1965 levels (50% 2012, 51% 2009, 57% 2008, 32% 1965).
TABLE 1A
FACTORS IN IMPROVING PUBLIC SCHOOL STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT
"Thinking about public school education in the United States, how important is each of the following for improving student achievement in America's public schools (grades K-12)?"
FACTORS IN IMPROVING PUBLIC SCHOOL STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT
"Thinking about public school education in the United States, how important is each of the following for improving student achievement in America's public schools (grades K-12)?"
Base: All adults
|
IMPORTANT
(NET)
|
Very Important
|
Important
|
NOT IMPORTANT
(NET)
|
Not that important
|
Not at all important
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
Recruiting and retaining highly qualified teachers
|
96
|
72
|
25
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
A positive school atmosphere
|
96
|
64
|
32
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
Increasing students' satisfaction with their school
|
90
|
49
|
42
|
10
|
7
|
2
|
Increasing teachers' satisfaction with their school
|
90
|
46
|
44
|
10
|
7
|
3
|
Increasing parents' satisfaction with their children's school
|
89
|
43
|
46
|
11
|
9
|
2
|
Note: Responses may not add up to 100% due to rounding
TABLE 1B
FACTORS IN IMPROVING PUBLIC SCHOOL STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT – By Education & Income
"Thinking about public school education in the United States, how important is each of the following for improving student achievement in America's public schools (grades K-12)?"
Percent saying "Very Important"
FACTORS IN IMPROVING PUBLIC SCHOOL STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT – By Education & Income
"Thinking about public school education in the United States, how important is each of the following for improving student achievement in America's public schools (grades K-12)?"
Percent saying "Very Important"
Base: All adults
|
Total
|
Education
|
Income
|
||
No College Degree
|
College Degree
|
Under $35,000
|
$35,000 Or More
|
||
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
Recruiting and retaining highly qualified teachers
|
72
|
72
|
70
|
74
|
71
|
A positive school atmosphere
|
64
|
66
|
60
|
67
|
62
|
Increasing students' satisfaction with their school
|
49
|
53
|
39
|
55
|
44
|
Increasing teachers' satisfaction with their school
|
46
|
47
|
43
|
52
|
43
|
Increasing parents' satisfaction with their children's school
|
43
|
47
|
33
|
51
|
39
|
Note: Responses may not add up to 100% due to rounding
TABLE 2
TEACHER RECRUITMENT & RETENTION PRIORITIES
"Many solutions have been suggested to recruit and retain highly qualified teachers in America's public schools. Given that there are limited resources, do you think that each of the following is something that must be done as one of the highest priorities, should be done as a lower priority, or should no additional resources be devoted to it?"
TEACHER RECRUITMENT & RETENTION PRIORITIES
"Many solutions have been suggested to recruit and retain highly qualified teachers in America's public schools. Given that there are limited resources, do you think that each of the following is something that must be done as one of the highest priorities, should be done as a lower priority, or should no additional resources be devoted to it?"
Base: All adults
|
Must be done as one of the highest priorities
|
Should be done as a lower priority
|
No additional resources devoted
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
Giving schools more ability to remove teachers who are not serving students well
|
73
|
18
|
9
|
Using measurements of teacher effectiveness that are based in significant part on student growth
|
59
|
28
|
13
|
Providing more or better opportunities for professional development for teachers
|
55
|
33
|
12
|
Efforts by schools and districts to improve teachers' job satisfaction
|
51
|
33
|
15
|
Providing better teacher bonuses and salary increases
|
45
|
35
|
20
|
Note: Responses may not add up to 100% due to rounding
TABLE 3A
SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT PRIORITY FOR TEACHER RECRUITMENT & RETENTION – By Generation
"While all of the following might be important, if only one could be funded which one should it be?"
SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT PRIORITY FOR TEACHER RECRUITMENT & RETENTION – By Generation
"While all of the following might be important, if only one could be funded which one should it be?"
Base: All adults
|
TOTAL
|
Generation
|
|||
Echo Boomers (18-35)
|
Generation X
(36-47)
|
Baby Boomers (48-66)
|
Matures (67+)
|
||
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
Giving schools more ability to remove teachers who are not serving students well
|
43
|
31
|
39
|
50
|
61
|
Using measurements of teacher effectiveness that are based in significant part on student growth
|
21
|
25
|
20
|
18
|
17
|
Providing more or better opportunities for professional development for teachers
|
14
|
16
|
14
|
14
|
9
|
Providing better teacher bonuses and salary increases
|
13
|
16
|
17
|
11
|
6
|
Efforts by schools and districts to improve teachers' job satisfaction
|
9
|
12
|
9
|
8
|
7
|
Note: Responses may not add up to 100% due to rounding
TABLE 3B
SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT PRIORITY FOR TEACHER RECRUITMENT & RETENTION – By Parents and Party
"While all of the following might be important, if only one could be funded which one should it be?"
SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT PRIORITY FOR TEACHER RECRUITMENT & RETENTION – By Parents and Party
"While all of the following might be important, if only one could be funded which one should it be?"
Base: All adults
|
TOTAL
|
Party Identification
|
Parents
|
|||
Republican
|
Democrat
|
Independent
|
Yes
|
No
|
||
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
Giving schools more ability to remove teachers who are not serving students well
|
43
|
53
|
33
|
45
|
36
|
45
|
Using measurements of teacher effectiveness that are based in significant part on student growth
|
21
|
18
|
24
|
18
|
21
|
20
|
Providing more or better opportunities for professional development for teachers
|
14
|
10
|
14
|
17
|
14
|
14
|
Providing better teacher bonuses and salary increases
|
13
|
13
|
16
|
11
|
16
|
12
|
Efforts by schools and districts to improve teachers' job satisfaction
|
9
|
7
|
12
|
9
|
12
|
8
|
Note: Responses may not add up to 100% due to rounding
TABLE 4A
PERCEPTIONS OF TEACHER INCOME IN LOCAL COMMUNITY – By Parental Status, Party & Gender
"Do you feel teachers in the public schools in your community are paid too little, too much or about the right amount?"
PERCEPTIONS OF TEACHER INCOME IN LOCAL COMMUNITY – By Parental Status, Party & Gender
"Do you feel teachers in the public schools in your community are paid too little, too much or about the right amount?"
Base: All adults
|
TOTAL
|
Parents
|
Party Identification
|
Gender
|
||||
Yes
|
No
|
Republican
|
Democrat
|
Independent
|
Male
|
Female
|
||
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
Too much
|
12
|
11
|
12
|
18
|
5
|
14
|
17
|
7
|
About the right amount
|
33
|
32
|
33
|
37
|
29
|
34
|
34
|
31
|
Too little
|
46
|
51
|
45
|
39
|
56
|
44
|
40
|
52
|
Not sure
|
9
|
6
|
10
|
6
|
10
|
9
|
9
|
9
|
Note: Responses may not add up to 100% due to rounding
TABLE 4B
PERCEPTIONS OF TEACHER INCOME IN LOCAL COMMUNITY – By Region & Year
"Do you feel teachers in the public schools in your community are paid too little, too much or about the right amount?"
PERCEPTIONS OF TEACHER INCOME IN LOCAL COMMUNITY – By Region & Year
"Do you feel teachers in the public schools in your community are paid too little, too much or about the right amount?"
Base: All adults
|
Region
|
Year
|
||||||
East
|
Midwest
|
South
|
West
|
2012
|
2009
|
2008
|
1965
|
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
Too much
|
18
|
16
|
5
|
12
|
12
|
8
|
6
|
2
|
About the right amount
|
42
|
34
|
28
|
30
|
33
|
29
|
24
|
56
|
Too little
|
31
|
43
|
57
|
48
|
46
|
54
|
59
|
42
|
Not sure
|
9
|
7
|
10
|
10
|
9
|
10
|
10
|
n/a
|
Note: Responses may not add up to 100% due to rounding
Note: 1965 survey conducted face-to-face; data should be used for comparison purposes only, and not as a direct trend.
TABLE 5A
PERCEPTIONS OF PUBLIC SCHOOL SPENDING IN LOCAL COMMUNITY – By Parental Status, Party & Gender
"Do you feel too little, too much, or about the right amount of money is being spent on public schools in your community?"
PERCEPTIONS OF PUBLIC SCHOOL SPENDING IN LOCAL COMMUNITY – By Parental Status, Party & Gender
"Do you feel too little, too much, or about the right amount of money is being spent on public schools in your community?"
Base: All adults
|
TOTAL
|
Parents
|
Party Identification
|
Gender
|
||||
Yes
|
No
|
Republican
|
Democrat
|
Independent
|
Male
|
Female
|
||
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
Too much
|
15
|
14
|
16
|
21
|
8
|
18
|
20
|
11
|
About the right amount
|
27
|
25
|
27
|
31
|
23
|
29
|
29
|
25
|
Too little
|
50
|
57
|
48
|
39
|
63
|
46
|
46
|
54
|
Not sure
|
8
|
4
|
9
|
8
|
6
|
7
|
5
|
10
|
Note: Responses may not add up to 100% due to rounding
TABLE 5B
PERCEPTIONS OF PUBLIC SCHOOL SPENDING IN LOCAL COMMUNITY – By Region & Year
"Do you feel too little, too much, or about the right amount of money is being spent on public schools in your community?"
PERCEPTIONS OF PUBLIC SCHOOL SPENDING IN LOCAL COMMUNITY – By Region & Year
"Do you feel too little, too much, or about the right amount of money is being spent on public schools in your community?"
Base: All adults
|
Region
|
Year
|
||||||
East
|
Midwest
|
South
|
West
|
2012
|
2009
|
2008
|
1965
|
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
Too much
|
16
|
19
|
10
|
18
|
15
|
14
|
13
|
12
|
About the right amount
|
36
|
28
|
24
|
21
|
27
|
26
|
20
|
56
|
Too little
|
42
|
48
|
55
|
54
|
50
|
51
|
57
|
32
|
Not sure
|
6
|
6
|
11
|
6
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
n/a
|
Note: Responses may not add up to 100% due to rounding
Note: 1965 survey conducted face-to-face; data should be used for comparison purposes only, and not as a direct trend,
Methodology
This Harris Poll was conducted online within the United States between July 16 and 23, 2012
among 2,311 adults (aged 18 and over). Figures for age, sex,
race/ethnicity, education, region and household income were weighted
where necessary to bring them into line with their actual proportions in
the population. Propensity score weighting was also used to adjust for
respondents' propensity to be online.
All sample surveys and polls, whether or not they use probability
sampling, are subject to multiple sources of error which are most often
not possible to quantify or estimate, including sampling error, coverage
error, error associated with nonresponse, error associated with
question wording and response options, and post-survey weighting and
adjustments. Therefore, Harris Interactive avoids the words "margin of
error" as they are misleading. All that can be calculated are different
possible sampling errors with different probabilities for pure,
unweighted, random samples with 100% response rates. These are only
theoretical because no published polls come close to this ideal.
Respondents for this survey were selected from among those who have
agreed to participate in Harris Interactive surveys. The data have been
weighted to reflect the composition of the adult population. Because the
sample is based on those who agreed to participate in the Harris
Interactive panel, no estimates of theoretical sampling error can be
calculated.
SOURCE Harris Interactive